Tuesday, September 11, 2012

News articles and links from September 11, 2012


Rivers

Editorial
From Stockton Record - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

Coalition response...A closer look at this study reveals that it talks a lot about jobs but not about the other impacts that are harmful to productive farmland, the local economy and the region's tax base. While the report admits that its purpose is not to provide a full-scale cost-benefit calculation, it is important for the public to understand what is at stake for farmers and farmland resources. The report lacks balance and fails to provide information on the potential job-killing impacts and economic harm that restoration activities will have on the Valley's farmers, the communities they support and local government. Farmland adjacent to the river has already been impacted by restoration flows as water seepage is flooding adjacent farmland and flooding crops. Future conversion of private property to riverbank habitat will remove thousands of acres from food production with the resultant job losses and tax base reductions.

While job creation in the Valley is needed and the UC Merced study identifies the jobs that will come with the San Joaquin River restoration, it fell short by omitting the negative economic consequences that are over the horizon.
  
Delta

Story
From Brentwood Press - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

Coalition response...It is a fallacy to think that the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan and the proposed tunnels will impact the Delta and Sacramento River by "sucking it dry." There are laws within the State Water Code that prevent this from happening. These claims, like many others by critics of the proposal, are designed to inflame public reaction against a proposal that is currently the best proposal to secure a reliable water future for California.

The BDCP is guided by the legislative goals of providing a reliable water supply and at the same time restore the Delta ecosystem. Researchers, biologists and scientists have worked for years to develop the proposal that is before us today.

Increased conservation and additional storage are also a part of the long-term solutions to California's water problems but they are only part of the solution. Answering the problems associated with moving water through the Delta to 25 million Californians and several million acres of farmland that grows the food we rely upon is also a part of the solution.

PEOPLE

Press release
From USBR - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012

Story
From Union Democrat - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

DELTA

Blog
By Alex Breitler
From esanjoaquin - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

Blog
By Damien M. Schiff
From Pacific Legal Foundation - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

Monday, September 10, 2012

News articles and links from September 10, 2012


Delta

Report
From USGS  

Coalition response...This study correctly points out that surface water deliveries resulted in farmers turning off their groundwater pumps and groundwater levels rising and subsidence decreasing. The study also notes that when surface water deliveries are cut back, the rates of subsidence return as farmers are forced to use their pumps to keep their crops alive. Environmental regulations that restrict the delivery of water flowing through the Delta to San Joaquin Valley farms also cause fallowing of crop land and a loss of jobs, and the predicted drop in groundwater levels along with increased subsidence rates. Reversing groundwater overdraft requires improvements in our ability to deliver surface water reliably and in amounts adequate to grow sufficient food for the public.

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Mountain Democrat - Monday, Sept. 10, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Sunday, Sept. 9, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Sunday, Sept. 9, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Saturday, Sept. 8, 2012

Story
From Desert Sun - Friday, Sept. 7, 2012

DELTA

Story
From Eureka Times-Standard - Sunday, Sept. 9, 2012

Blog
By John Bass
From Delta National Park - Sunday, Sept. 9, 2012

Press Release
From Delta Stewardship Council - Friday, Sept. 7, 2012

Story
From Mountain Democrat - Friday, Sept. 7, 2012

Letter
From Sacramento Bee - Friday, Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, September 7, 2012

News articles and links from September 7, 2012


WATER SUPPLY

Viewpoint
By Randy Record and John Coleman
From Sacramento Bee - Friday, Sept. 7, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

Story
From SF Chronicle - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

DELTA

Blog
From State Water Contractors - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

Blog
By Damien M. Schiff
From Pacific Legal Foundation - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

Video

Thursday, September 6, 2012

News articles and links from September 6, 2012


Delta

Opinion
By Bill Jennings
From Capitol Weekly - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Coalition response...Thirty years ago the proposal was focused on water supply while the current BDCP proposal adds Delta restoration efforts to the plan; it is not the same as 30 years ago. BDCP responds to the legislative mandate that both water supply reliability and Delta ecosystem restoration be equally addressed. Critics of the BDCP continue to mislead the public by linking BCDP to a 30-year-old proposal.
 
These same critics also attempt to mislead the public by claiming that water flowing through the Delta is exported to corporate farmers. These supposed "corporate" farmers they target are mostly family farmers who have been on the land for generations. Family farmers represent 96% of all the farms in California, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 
 
Claims of subsidized water are also widely voiced without clarification. The only subsidy related to water deliveries is the congressional decision when building the Central Valley Project to waive the interest charge on construction costs that must be repaid by farmers. That decision was based on the realization of the abundance of food that would be produced by that water. There is no subsidy in the current BDCP proposals. Water users will pay all costs associated with the water they receive.

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Story
From Fresno Business Journal - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

WATER QUALITY

Story
From Santa Maria Times - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

Blog
From KMTG Natural Resources - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

RIVERS

Story
From Stockton Record - Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012

DELTA

Q/A
From Planning Report - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Story
From ACWA - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Letter
By Sen. Lois Wolk
From Modesto Bee - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Report

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

News articles and links from September 5, 2012


Delta

Blog
By Patricia McBroom
From The California Spigot - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Coalition response...Resources Secretary Jerry Meral has repeatedly stated that all interests will be heard in the development process of the BDCP. During the July announcement by Gov. Brown and U.S. Interior Secretary Salazar, a blueprint for moving forward included the establishment of a new Stakeholder Council that will include representatives from local government agencies within the Delta, fishing organizations, hunting organizations and more. The  "State and Federal Principals Joint Recommendations Regarding Key Elements of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan" would be a worthwhile read for anyone interested in the BDCP process.

Blog
By Dan Bacher
From IndyBay Media - Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012

Coalition response...The claim that the Kern Water Bank was "developed with state money and taxpayer approved bonds" is incorrect. The Kern Water Bank property was originally acquired by the California Department of Water Resources through the use of funds provided by the 29 water districts that participate in the State Water Project. In 1996 the Kern County Water Agency relinquished 45,000 acre-feet of its contracted right to State Water Project supplies in exchange for the acquisition of the Kern Fan Element Property from the California Department of Water Resources. Now known as the Kern Water Bank and administered by the Kern Water Bank Authority, about 1.2 million-acre-feet of water can be stored through percolation into the aquifer. More than $65 million has been invested since the 1996 transaction to make the Kern Water Bank a success to the people of California and the environment without the use of taxpayer money.

Blog
By Barry Nelson
From NRDC - Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012

Coalition response...The author is focused on exports of water that flows through the Delta as the sole cause of ecosystem problems in the Delta. He applies a recent EPA document to exports but fails to make that same application to other factors, such as invasive species (90+% of aquatic species), loss of 90+% of historic habitat, water quality, discharge of tons of ammonia each day into the waters, exploding predator fish populations and adverse ocean conditions (temperature and food supply) which all pose threats to the salmon population. The most recent report from the National Academy of Sciences clearly explained that to focus on one factor will not solve the ills of the Delta. The Academy endorses the comprehensive planning approach the BDCP is undertaking.

Biologists, researchers and scientists have worked for years in developing the BDCP and the author attempts to discount their efforts with his reasoning. However, he is correct in stating that BDCP "must incorporate the best available science about the needs of the ecosystem and its fisheries." A thorough review of the BDCP material reveals that is exactly what is happening.

Story
From Central Valley Business Times - Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012

Coalition response...It is important to remember that the co-equal goals mandated by the legislature are a reliable water supply and a restored Delta ecosystem. All of California will benefit from the achievement of these two goals and not just a select group. That is why ecosystem and project construction costs are divided among the groups that benefit. When Shasta Dam and Oroville Dam were built there were recognized benefits that include flood protection, water supply and recreation. The costs were apportioned according to the benefits.  

WATER QUALITY

Story
From Ag Alert - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

RIVERS

Blog
By Mark Grossi
From Fresno Beehive - Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012

DELTA

Blog
By Stephen R. Miller
From Land Use Prof Blog - Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012
  
Opinion
By Marion Ashley
From Riverside Press-Enterprise - Sunday, Sept. 2, 2012

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

News articles and links from September 4, 2012


WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012

RIVERS

Story
From Fresno Bee - Saturday, Sept. 1, 2012

DELTA

Story
From Stockton Record - Saturday, Sept. 1, 2012