Monday, January 14, 2013

News articles and links from January 14, 2013


WATER SUPPLY

Blog
By Jay Lund
From California WaterBlog - Sunday, Jan. 13, 2013

Letter
From Bakersfield Californian - Saturday, Jan. 12, 2013

Op-ed
By Jon Parker
From Bakersfield Californian - Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013

Blog
By Ken Clark
From AccuWeather - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

Blog
By Lewis Griswold
From Fresno Beehive - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

Blog
From Mark Grossi
From Fresno Beehive - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

Story
From Chico Enterprise-Record - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

DELTA  

Story
From Stockton Record - Monday, Jan. 14, 2013

Video
From YouTube - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

FISHERIES

Op-ed
By Ted Sheeley
From Western Farm Press - Monday, Jan. 14, 2013

Story
From Marysville Appeal-Democrat - Sunday, Jan. 13, 2013

MEETINGS

Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013

Wednesday/Thursday, Jan. 16-17, 2013

Thursday, Jan. 17, 2013

Friday, January 11, 2013

News articles and links from January 11, 2013


WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Western Farm Press - Friday, Jan. 11, 2013

Story
From Porterville Recorder - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Thursday, Jan. 10, 2012

RIVERS

Story
From YubaNet - Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013

GROUNDWATER

Report

Story
From Desert Sun - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2012

PEOPLE

Story
From Modesto Bee - Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013

MEETINGS

Announcement

Announcement

Announcement

Thursday, January 10, 2013

News articles and links from January 10, 2013


Rivers

Story
From Modesto Bee - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Coalition response...Some federal agencies have been calling for years for more water as the only way to boost salmon numbers. Well, it hasn't worked and they are still clamoring for more water from cities and farmers. To cast aside suggestions by water districts that call for enhanced streambed restoration is a disservice not only to the public but also the environment. Additional suggestions called for reduced predatory fish, changing ocean fishing rules and improved hatchery practices need to be seriously considered and implemented.

Scientists from the Pacific Fisheries Management Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service have already identified poor ocean conditions---warm temperatures and reduced food supply---as the leading cause of the drop in salmon numbers. Isn't it time we listen to the scientists and start seeking real answers that will result in benefits that we can all enjoy?

Delta

Opinion
By Nick Di Croce
From SF Chronicle - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Coalition response...This article fails to present a full picture of the water issue that is confronting California and the solutions that are being developed. The current proposal addresses two very important goals developed by the Legislature: a reliable water supply and restoration of the Delta ecosystem. Scientists, biologists, researchers and others are pulling together a plan that achieves these goals.

Users who will receive water from the current proposal that includes improved conveyance in the Delta will pay their associated costs. A study by U.C. Berkeley economist David Sunding reveals that in addition to benefits realized by water users, California's economy will also benefit.

Water infrastructure in our state has been example to others for many years but it is showing its age. Guaranteeing California's water future requires an upgrade in this infrastructure and the current proposal is a major step in that direction.

Letter
From Sacramento Bee - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Coalition response...According to the National Marine Fisheries Service, ocean conditions, poor water quality and predation are significant causes for the decline of Delta fish species. This year's disastrous fall mid-water trawl survey results are even more alarming because we've done little more than cut water supplies since 1992 and the results aren't getting any better. Cutting back water deliveries is not the answer. We can no longer simply say that fish need more and more water. It's more complicated than that. Continuing to use old solutions to today's complex problems doesn't cut it anymore, especially when the old ways aren't providing any improvements in the system.
  
By Alex Breitler
From esanjoaquin - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Coalition response...Claiming that "Last year's pumping curtailments were not intended specifically to help smelt." is indeed splitting hairs. The fact that both smelt and salmon numbers are down this year is a clear indication that the simplistic approach of just cutting water supplies isn't helping either salmon or smelt recover. It's time for a new approach that recognizes other stressors in the system and then manage it accordingly.

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Woodland Daily Democrat - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

DELTA

Story
From Mountain Democrat - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013 

Story
From ACWA - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

RIVERS

Story
From Marysville Appeal-Democrat - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Letter
From Marysville Appeal-Democrat - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

MEETINGS

Announcement

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

News articles and links from January 9, 2013


Delta

(This story was previously printed in the San Jose Mercury News.)
Story
From Contra Costa Times - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013
From Oakland Tribune - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Coalition response...It is not a surprise that the fish counts are low when one considers that the only effort undertaken by officials governing Delta water is to reduce water deliveries. These reductions have been instituted for years and yet the fish continue to decline. Cutting back water deliveries is not the answer. Other actions should be taken that address poor water quality, predatory fish and invasive species. We can no longer simply say that fish need more and more water. It's more complicated than that.
 
Actions that have reduced water deliveries have failed to clearly provide a price tag on the cost to consumers. During a 14-day period in December, public water agencies were required to reduce the amount of water they move through the Delta because of the Delta smelt. As a result, more than 250,000 acre-feet of water was lost without even a plan on measuring benefits for the environment.
 
Continuing to use old solutions to today's complex problems doesn't cut it anymore, especially when the old ways aren't providing any improvements in the system. The lost water could have served more than a million people for a full year. It could have grown hundreds of millions of dollars in farm products and created jobs throughout the economy. Instead it went to the ocean and no one can say whether it did any good at all. 

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Hanford Sentinel - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Story
From Monterey Herald - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Story
From Capital Press - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Blog
By John Fleck
From Inkstain - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

DELTA

Report

COURTS

Story
From Ag Alert - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Blog
By Richard S. Deitchman
From Somach Simmons & Dunn - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Story
From LA Times - Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013

Story
From Modesto Bee - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Blog
By Tony Francois
From Pacific Legal Foundation - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

News articles and links from January 8, 2013


Water supply

Opinion
By Tim Quinn
From SF Chronicle - Monday, Jan. 7, 2013

Coalition response...This article clearly explains the importance of upgrading a statewide water system that is in jeopardy. Many people may not recognize their reliance on water but Tim Quinn does a good job in presenting how water reaches into the lives of each person living in California. Leaders had the foresight years ago when the decision was made to construct a world-leading water system and that leadership should continue today.

Story
From San Jose Mercury News - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Coalition response...It is not a surprise that the fish counts are low when one considers that the only effort undertaken by officials governing Delta water is to reduce water deliveries. These reductions have been instituted for years and yet the fish continue to decline. Cutting back water deliveries is not the answer. Other actions should be taken that address poor water quality, predatory fish and invasive species. We can no longer simply say that fish need more and more water. It's more complicated than that.

Actions that have reduced water deliveries have failed to clearly provide a price tag on the cost to consumers. During a 14-day period in December, public water agencies were required to reduce the amount of water they move through the Delta because of the Delta smelt. As a result, more than 250,000 acre-feet of water was lost without even a plan on measuring benefits for the environment.

Continuing to use old solutions to today's complex problems doesn't cut it anymore, especially when the old ways aren't providing any improvements in the system. The lost water could have served more than a million people for a full year. It could have grown hundreds of millions of dollars in farm products and created jobs throughout the economy. Instead it went to the ocean and no one can say whether it did any good at all.

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Western Farm Press - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Story
From Western Farm Press - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Press release
From Western Canal Water District - Monday, Jan. 7, 2013

Story
From Wine Spectator - Monday, Jan. 7, 2013

Blog
By Todd Manley
From NCWA - Monday, Jan. 7, 2013

DELTA

Story
From Sacramento Bee - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

Story
From Aquafornia - Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013

MEETINGS

Announcement 

Announcement