BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN
Viewpoint
by Jane Wagner-Tyack
From Sacramento Bee - Sunday, March 24, 2013
Coalition response...Attempting to characterize the Bay Delta Conservation Plan as a means of
draining the north state is utterly baseless. The misguided claim that BDCP
will drain the Sacramento Valley and the Delta ignores the operational
guidelines that protect these regions. The amount of water that the project
could move is based on what river conditions would allow; sometimes more and
sometimes less. Visit www.farmwater.org/exportthrottle.pdf to learn
more about exports.
The author also claims that
existing pumping restrictions are insufficient to protect endangered fish but
she never mentions the lack of habitat in the Delta or the poor conditions in
the ocean, which the National Marine Fisheries Service has identified as the
leading cause for the dwindling salmon numbers. Add the high numbers of
juvenile salmon taken by predators and a more complete picture is presented on
factors affecting salmon. The predator problem is significant, especially when
one realizes that a recent study (www.farmwater.org/93percentsalmon6-5.pdf)
revealed that 93% of the juvenile smolts in the Tuolumne River, that make their
way to the Delta via the San Joaquin River, are eaten by predatory fish. That's
not healthy for any species regardless of the circumstances.
RIVERS
Letter
By David Guzzetta
From Merced Sun-Star - Friday, March 22, 2013
Coalition response...Individuals and groups concerned with the proposal by the State Water
Resources Control Board to designate higher flows in the Merced, Tuolumne and
Stanislaus rivers for fish are waiting for the scientific reasoning for the
decision. Water board staffers have publicly stated that it is unknown whether
the flow decision will benefit salmon.
Science must play an important
part in the decisions that regulate our water resources. A recent study as part
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's relicensing of Don Pedro Dam on
the Tuolumne River found that 93% of juvenile salmon in the river were consumed
by predator fish. Adding more water to the river will not solve the predator
problem and restore the salmon population.
ALLOCATIONS
Press release
From US Bureau of Reclamation - Friday, March 22, 2013
Press release
From California Farm Water Coalition - Friday, March
22, 2013
Press release
From San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority -
Friday, March 22, 2013
Press release
From Westlands Water District - Friday, March 22, 2013
Press release
From State Water Contractors - Friday, March 22, 2013
Story
From Hanford News - Saturday, March 23, 2013
Story
From Lake County News - Saturday, March 23, 2013
Story
From Fresno Bee - Friday, March 22, 2013
Story
From Oroville Mercury-Register - Friday, March 22,
2013
Story
From Modesto Bee - Friday, March 22, 2013
From San Jose Mercury News - Friday, March 22, 2013
From Visalia Times-Delta - Friday, March 22, 2013
From News 10 - Friday, March 22, 2013
Story
From Bakersfield Californian - Sunday, March 24, 2013
WATER SUPPLY
Story
From Manteca Bulletin - Saturday, March 23, 2013
Letter
From Fresno Bee - Saturday, March 23, 2013
BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN
Editorial
From San Diego Union-Tribune - Sunday, March 24, 2013
Story
From Fresno Bee - Sunday, March 24, 2013
From Sacramento Bee - Sunday, March 24, 2013
GROUNDWATER
Story
From Western Farm Press - Monday, March 25, 2013
RIVERS
Opinion
by Joshua Pedrozo
From Merced Sun-Star - Friday, March 22, 2013
Story
From Salinas Californian - Friday, March 22, 2013
WATER BOND
Blog
By Joel Fox
From Fox & Hounds - Monday, March 25, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment