Monday, June 10, 2013

News articles and links for June 10, 2013

Bay Delta Conservation Plan 

From: Dennis Wyatt, Manteca BulletinThe Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta could become saltier if the state builds the two massive diversion tunnels Gov. Jerry Brown has proposed to supply water to the Central Valley and Southern California.

Proposed tunnels could make delta water saltier
From: Associated Press, Modesto Bee
From: Associated Press, The RepublicThe Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta could become saltier if the state builds the two massive diversion tunnels Gov. Jerry Brown has proposed to supply water to the Central Valley and Southern California.

Delta could get saltier if tunnels are built
From: Matt Weiser, Sacramento Bee
From: Matt Weiser, Fresno Bee
From: Matt Weiser, Merced Sun-StarThe two giant water diversion tunnels Gov. Jerry Brown proposes building in the Delta would be large enough to meet annual water needs for a city such as Newport Beach in a single day's gulp from the Sacramento River.

That gulp, however, would also prevent a lot of fresh water from flowing through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This would likely make water saltier for farms near Isleton and cities such as Antioch, which draws some of its drinking water from the Delta.
(The following comment is made in response to the above stories.)
Coalition response...Water quality in the Delta has undergone continuous change ever since levees were first built nearly 150 years ago. These changes will continue into the future, with or without the BDCP.

Water quality standards are established by the State Water Resources Control Board and changes in water quality does not necessarily mean violations of those standards. As it does now, the Board will set water quality standards into the future and public water agencies will have to comply with them. Those standards will have to balance competing interests and should be reasonably protective of the needs of beneficial users.

The fear by some that too much water will be diverted from the Delta ignores the reality of how water will move through the tunnels. When the water level in the Sacramento River is high more water will be available for export. Lower flows means less water will be exported. Learn more at www.farmwater.org/exportthrottle.pdf.

The BDCP's intent is to restore a certainty of how much water will be delivered to users in the Bay Area and south of the Delta. The current system of delivering water has resulted in increased unemployment as farmland goes unplanted. Some urban residents have experienced higher costs for water delivered to their homes and businesses. Sensible and reliable water deliveries through the tunnels will help achieve the legislature's co-equal goals for water supply and Delta ecosystem restoration.


   



Water Supply 

Water conditions for June 9, 2013
From: Maven, Maven's Notebook

"The combined total January through May precipitation is the driest in about 90 years of record," states DWR's Executive Update on the state's hydrologic conditions.  A look at the reservoirs and the drought monitor is provided.

Levees

Our View: Levees define our existence, so care for them
From: Marysville Appeal-DemocratThe last paragraph in a story Thursday by Eric Vodden was probably its main point:

"There is nothing more important in this region than having secure levees."

So said Curt Akin, Yuba County Water Agency manager, in a story about a new collaboration of agencies responsible for Yuba-Sutter flood protection.

Wildlife 

Webcam in ag land helps hatching birds become Internet stars
From: Heather Hacking, Chico Enterprise-RecordThe show is over on the webcam at Western Canal Water District, between Durham and Richvale on the Midway.

Friday afternoon, three Killdeer eggs hatched and a mama bird was seen giving shade to the new arrivals. For about an hour, the staff at the water district zoomed the live webcam on the bird family, giving a close-up view of the nature employees see each day.

Friday, June 7, 2013

News articles and links for June 7, 2013

      Farming 

Farm Subsidies Leading to More Water Use
From: Ron Nixon, NY Times

Millions of dollars in farm subsidies for irrigation equipment aimed at water conservation have led to more water use, not less, threatening vulnerable aquifers and streams.


Coalition response...
Improving the quantity and quality of food and fiber produced per drop is an important investment in the future, not only for farmers but also for our nation. California farmers have increased their efficiency in applying irrigation water to grow their crops. Part of that improved efficiency has been the installation of new irrigation systems, some with partial funding from USDA programs. Over the last 40 years the volume of California farm products has almost doubled while using about the same amount of water. Consumers and the environment ultimately benefit from this improved efficiency of production. Restricting how farmers can use their water, as suggested by the Environmental Working Group, would penalize consumers.

Bay Delta Conservation Plan

Plan could help fisheries, water supply 
From: Charlton H. Bonham, SF Chronicle

 The Bay Delta Conservation Plan is proposed as a comprehensive approach to ecosystem restoration for the West Coast's largest estuary and water supply reliability for much of California that features large-scale habitat restoration and new water conveyance tunnels.

It is an attempt to break what has become a familiar cycle to Californians of conflict between fish populations and water supplies. Within the more than 20,000 pages of planning and review now available are scientifically sound ecological and natural resources conservation concepts that you need to know.

Final Delta Report Tells Costs 
From: Ron McNicoll, Independent Mobile News 

The final report on the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) for environmental restoration and water supply reliability provides a more specific outline of costs than past discussions of the plan.

Released on May 29, the plan shows that it will cost $19.7 billion in today's dollars to build the capital improvements to implement the plan. Some $14.5 billion of the total amount would be for water facilities construction, including two 35-mile tunnels that would convey fresh water under the Delta and deliver it to pumping stations in the south Delta.

Another $4.1 billion would be spent on building wetlands and other protections for fish and plants in the Delta. There would be $1.1 billion spent for various conservation measures.

Water Supply

No surface water for Tulare ID farmers this year
From: John Lindt, Fresno Business Journal

The driest January through April in California history has delivered a knockout punch for water deliveries in the 70,000-acre Tulare Irrigation District.

General Manager J. Paul Hendrix said TID will have no water run for only the fourth time in its 124-year history, as decided recently by its board of directors.

Drought cuts water for Klamath Project irrigators
From: Associated Press, Sacramento Bee

It will be another tight water year for farmers on the Klamath Reclamation project.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on Thursday released its operations plan for the project, which straddles the Oregon-California border south of Klamath Falls.

Meetings 

       
       Minimizing Costs with Drip/Micro Irrigation July 9, Five Points
         From: Western Farm Press
          
         Tuesday, July 9, 2013 * Five Points, CA

Thursday, June 6, 2013

News articles and links from June 6, 2013

      Bay Delta Conservation Plan
From: Restore the Delta, Antioch Herald

Restore the Delta, opponents of Gov. Jerry Brown's rush to build Peripheral Tunnels that would drain the Delta and doom salmon and other Pacific fisheries today released its "Simple Math" total of costs.

"The Brown Administration has released tens of thousands of pages but not one single, simple accounting of the costs," said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, executive director of Restore the Delta. "They are hiding the math because the cost keeps escalating and the benefits diminishing."

Coalition response...Restore the Delta's "Simple Math" attempt at quantifying the costs of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan and their statement that "it's not worth it" didn't provide enough information for a logical conclusion. Missing from the equation was the volume of water that could be reliably delivered for the cost of the project.

Considering that water users would pay the full $43.9 billion cost of the tunnels (habitat restoration is considered a public benefit and therefore a public cost) and then applying the historical average of about 5 million acre-feet of water delivered per year over the 50-year span of the project, RTD's simple math exercise pencils out to about $172 per acre-foot. In comparison to current prices farmers are encountering right now because of the water-short year, the $172/AF may not be too bad, especially if it brings reliability back to the system. Simple.

From: Dick Kincaide, Tri-Valley Times

Twin tunnels water proposal will be disaster.

In response to Jill Duerig and Beau Goldie's response to your editorial on why the Bay Delta Conservation Plan is not right for the Tri-Valley water district, it's the same story on a big fat NO AGAIN ON TWIN TUNNELS that will divert 50 percent or more of our precious water to Southern California and leave us high and dry in the coming future drought years.

Coalition response...The two tunnels will not divert 50% of the water that moves through the Delta as claimed by the letter writer. Export levels have only been about 20% and the amount of water to be sent through the tunnels will be based on available supply. When the water level in the Sacramento River is high more water will be available to move through the tunnels. Lower flows means less water will be exported. Learn more at www.farmwater.org/exportthrottle.pdf

Water rights were issued long ago to public water agencies in central and southern California and the Bay area for the purpose of serving farms, homes and businesses. California law prevents the Bay Delta Conservation Plan from negatively impacting existing water rights holders. Claiming that BDCP will dry up an existing water supply is false.

New water storage is needed in our state and BDCP provides the opportunity to realize full benefits from new storage.

Bay Delta Conservation Plan

Big data and our big delta plan
From: Lois Kazakoff, SF Chronicle

By the numbers, the state's proposal to restore the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta ecosystem and fashion a "reliable" water supply is daunting:

- 7 years in the making
- 20,000 documents in the plan and supporting scientific studies
- 57 endangered species whose needs were assessed
- 214 specific biologic goals
- $54.1 billion to construct two tunnels, restore delta habitat, administer the project and pay the interest on the bonds ($26.3 billion interest on the tunnel revenue bonds plus $3.2 billion on the general obligation bonds).

Allocations

Reclamation Announces Update to the 2013 Central Valley Project Water Allocation for Friant Division Water Service Contractors
From: Press release, US Bureau of Reclamation

After reviewing the latest runoff data from the California Department of Water Resources and the National Weather Service that was developed since the week of May 29, the Bureau of Reclamation has determined that better than expected conditions allow for an improvement in the Central Valley Project's Friant Division allocation.

Reclamation ups water allocations
From: Central Valley Business Times

Buyers of Central Valley Project Friant Division water might now get half of the amounts they're hoping for this year, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation says Wednesday.

Quantification Settlement Agreement 

Judge upholds landmark California water pact
From: Elizabeth Varin and Alejandro Davila, Imperial Valley Press

A California judge has upheld the nation's largest farm-to-city water transfer.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Lloyd Connelly ruled Tuesday that authorities properly weighed the environmental impact of the landmark 2003 Quantification Settlement Agreement, a set of agreements on how to divide the state's share of Colorado River water. The centerpiece calls for the Imperial Valley to transfer water to San Diego.

Quantification Settlement Agreement upheld by judge
From: Elliot Spagat, Desert Sun

A judge has upheld the nation's largest farm-to-city water transfer, ruling that state authorities in California properly considered the environmental effects of the landmark 2003 Quantification Settlement Agreement over how to divide the state's share of Colorado River water.


Salton Sea

Mediation to continue on Salton Sea restoration solutions
From: Alejandro Davila and Elizabeth Varin, Imperial Valley Press

Mediation on how to address impacts caused by the nation's largest farm-to-city water transfer will continue between Imperial County and the Imperial Irrigation District, officials said Wednesday, although what that mediation will produce is still unclear.



Wednesday, June 5, 2013

News articles and links from June 5, 2013


Bay Delta Conservation Plan

From: Cindy Manduffie, Sacramento Bee

Coalition response...Cindy Manduffie is concerned about the health of the Delta's aquatic ecosystems and rightfully so. The Delta is broken. It doesn't provide the habitat for native fish to thrive anymore. Poor water quality has fundamentally changed the chemistry of the Delta, reducing the food supply that starts at the base of the food chain. Baby salmon don't stand a chance because of non-native predators that consume them by the millions as they try to make it to the ocean. Unnatural river flows take fish to a dead end at the south end of the Delta where predators lurk. 

The Bay Delta Conservation Plan is designed to reverse the trend that Ms. Manduffie has identified while continuing to meet the water supply needs of thousands of farmers and 25 million Californians. We can't sit still and we can't go back to 1850 before the Delta was drained. The right protections coupled with sound science and engineering can bring back the native fishery and continue to meet the water supply needs of a state that is the 9th largest economy in the world.

From: Steven Greenhut, Bloomberg

Coalition response...A clarification is needed to this story---Judges have not "routinely shut down the pumps." Instead, it has been biological opinions written by federal fish agencies that have caused the disruption in water deliveries without improvements to fish populations that they are designed to protect. These biological opinions ignore the most recent science that identifies a loss of habitat, water quality, predation and poor ocean conditions as causes for smelt and salmon declines.

A federal judge ruled in May 2010 that federal fish agencies must rewrite the biological opinions and this time include recognition of negative impacts to humans resulting from the opinions. We're still waiting for that rewrite.

Colorado River

From: Bob Berwyn, Summit County Citizens Voice

Coalition response...California farmers who grow food using Colorado River water provide a significant portion of the nation's fresh fruits and vegetables during certain times of the year. Selecting the right crop to grow depends on a number of factors, including whether or not there is a market for it. It's pointless to plant a crop that uses less water if it can't be sold. Some might consider that even more wasteful.

Ongoing discussions regarding the supply of Colorado River water must include farmers and the public water agencies that deliver water to the farms. Reducing the amount of water used in California to grow food may ultimately have an impact on the amount of fresh, local food products at the grocery store.

Quantification Settlement Agreement 

From: Associated Press, Imperial Valley Press

From:Mission Times Courier

Water Supply

From: Los Angeles Times

Transfers

From: Kate Campbell, Ag Alert

Infrastructure

From: Bettina Boxall, Los Angeles Times

From: Matthew Daly, Modesto Bee

Meetings 

From: Staff, Chico Enterprise-Record

From: Staff, Modesto Bee

From: Water Association of Kern County

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

News articles and links from June 4, 2013


Bay Delta Conservation Plan

From: Max Young, Sacramento Bee

Coalition response...California's system of water rights allocates water supply to users throughout the state even though the majority of the supply is in Northern California. Water is a public resource intended to benefit the population as a whole. This protects both area-of-origin water users in Northern California and water rights holders elsewhere.

Water rights were issued long ago to public water agencies in central and southern California for the purpose of serving farms, homes and businesses. The Delta tunnels are simply a more efficient way to move that water while minimizing negative impacts on fish species and the Delta ecosystem. And to protect in-Delta water users export pumping will vary depending on the volume of available in the system. When the water level in the Sacramento River is high more water will be available to move through the tunnels. Lower flows means less water will be exported. Learn more at www.farmwater.org/exportthrottle.pdf

Farming

From: Don Knutson, Sacramento Bee

Coalition response...California's dairy industry leads the nation because of one thing: efficiency. It is simply more efficient to raise cows in a mild climate than it is in a state where freezing temperatures dominate a significant part of the year. As a result, California's dairy cattle out-produce Wisconsin by an average of 2,021 pounds per cow per year, nearly 10% more efficient yield. Dairy products are an important staple in the American diet. The fact that more water is required to produce a serving of cheese as opposed to a serving of tomatoes is irrelevant. Californians are rightly proud of our ability to efficiently produce a diverse food supply here in California.

Bay Delta Conservation Plan

From: Maven, Maven's Notebook

Water Supply

From: Jeff Barnard, Orange County Register

Farming

From: Catherine Green, LA Times

Fisheries

From: Peter Moyle, California WaterBlog

Salton Sea

From: Ian James, Desert Sun

Courts

From: Janet Zimmerman, Riverside Press-Enterprise

Monday, June 3, 2013

News articles and links from June 3, 2013


Bay Delta Conservation Plan

From: LA Times

Coalition response...The editorial writers do a good job in recognizing that everyone will lose if something is not done to fix the Delta and achieve a reliable water supply and restore the Delta ecosystem. Scientists and researchers have worked for seven years to develop the Bay Delta Conservation Plan as the best opportunity to achieve these goals. Now is the time for all interests in California to come together to resolve the problems that have plagued our state's water for 150 years by moving forward with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan.  

From: John Wildermuth, Fox and Hounds
From: John Wildermuth, Redding Record Searchlight

Coalition response...California's water picture has changed since voters went to the polling booth in 1982. Many changes have occurred over the past 30 years, including regulatory restrictions based on evolving environmental policies.  These changes take water away from people and from the farms that grow our food. Years of scientific study and research have resulted in the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) - an opportunity to improve water supply reliability, while improving the Delta ecosystem. 

It is important to understand that BDCP is not the 1982 plan to build the Peripheral Canal. The canal was an isolated facility while BDCP's tunnels provide operational flexibility to maintain in-Delta water quality. The canal had a capacity to divert 21,800 cubic feet per second of water and the tunnels' capacity is only 9,000 cfs. Learn more at www.farmwater.org/p-canalcomparison.pdf.

From: Ross Farrow, Lodi News-Sentinel

Coalition response...Seven years of scientific research has gone into the development of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP), which is the best opportunity to provide a reliable water supply and to restore the Delta ecosystem, both mandates from the California Legislature. Recent proposals to fix the Delta have surfaced from individuals and organizations but do not fulfill this legislative directive. Changes have been made to BDCP from its earlier drafts, including a change in the tunnel capacity to transport water, from 21,000 cubic feet per second to only 9,000 cfs. Also changed as been the number of tunnels from three to two.

BDCP is the best opportunity California has to reliably deliver water to 25 million Californians and thousands of farmers and to restore the Delta ecosystem in a way that protects fish.

From: Andy Ball, San Jose Mercury News

Coalition response...Andy Ball does a good job describing the danger to California if action is not taken now to fix the Delta. We must look to a solution that is based on science and will benefit all of California. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) is that answer.

Those who benefit from the improved conveyance will pay for the construction, operation and maintenance costs. State and federal funding sources are being identified to pay for ecosystem restoration and enhancement. Improvements to the Delta include the creation of more than a 100,000 acres of habitat that will protect fish and support other ecosystem restoration efforts.

The tunnels will provide an improved, reliable conveyance of water through the Delta that has been absent in recent years. Farmland has gone unplanted and water costs to many urban residents have risen as a result of the precarious water supply.

Andy Ball understands why the Bay Delta Conservation Plan is an important part of California's water future.


Transfers

From: Herb Jacobson, Chico Enterprise-Record

Coalition response...The proposed water transfer from Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (GCID) required the district to conduct extensive research to guarantee the absence of negative impacts to the local community, including groundwater levels. This research is required by Reclamation before approval is granted. GCID used the best available science to model any effects from the transfer and committed to a monitoring program that assures a protection for the environment.

Bay Delta Conservation Plan

From: Stuart Leavenworth, Sacramento Bee

Water Supply

From: Antoine Abou-Diwan and Richard Montenegro Brown, Imperial Valley Press

From: Joe Little, ABC 10 TV

Groundwater

From: John Cox, Bakersfield Californian

From: Lisa M. Krieger, Contra Costa Times

Transfers

From: Heather Hacking, Chico Enterprise-Record

San Joaquin River

From: Carol Campodonica, Merced Sun-Star

Fisheries

From: Edward Ortiz, Sacramento Bee

From: Associated Press, KTVU TV

From: Associated Press, Stockton Record
From: Associated Press, Contra Costa Times
From: Associated Press, Fresno Bee
From: Associated Press, Modesto Bee
From: Associated Press, Sacramento Bee
From: Associated Press, Silicon Valley Mercury News

Courts

From: Desert Sun

From: Ben McCall, Desert Sun