Friday, December 21, 2012

News articles and links from December 21, 2012


WATER SUPPLY

Forecast
From AccuWeather - Friday, Dec. 21, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Friday, Dec. 21, 2012

DELTA

Story
From ACWA - Thursday, Dec. 20, 2012

Thursday, December 20, 2012

News articles and links from December 20, 2012


WATER SUPPLY

Forecast
From AccuWeather - Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012

Story
From The Economist - December 2012

Story
From Salinas Californian - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

GROUNDWATER

Press release
From Best Best & Krieger - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

News articles and links from December 19, 2012


Water supply 

Blog
By Rick Paulas
From KCET - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Coalition response...A disconcerting element of this report is the attempt to place social values on the water used to produce meat and dairy products. Consumer choices and federal nutrition guidelines include these items and most people find them to be a valuable part of a balanced diet. It takes feed like alfalfa, hay and corn to produce meat, ice cream and cheese. Suggesting that people will "help make the world a better place" by avoiding meat or dairy products is social engineering at its worst.

Consumers also benefit economically from domestic food production by paying less at the grocery store than their counterparts in 28 other high-income countries. Americans pay just 6.2% of their disposable income on food and non-alcoholic beverages each year. Those in other high-income countries pay 10.2%, which at the same rate would cost Americans $3,820 more each year (in 2010 dollars) to feed their families ( http://www.farmwater.org/foodcoststudy.pdf).

Also absent in the study are those additional values derived from water used on California farms. Jobs are provided for millions of employees both on the farm and through marketing channels, such as trucking, processing, service and export terminal jobs, with a total economic impact of $112 billion, according to the UC Davis Ag Issues Center. Don't forget that taxes are also generated from these farms that help support local schools and other government activities.

California is the seventh largest economy in the world and any effort designed to shift water use based on economic value is misleading. After all, most Californians would agree that the availability of fresh California-grown fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy products far outweigh the taste and nutrition of a "high-value" product such as a shoe or a computer. Readers of this report should realize the value they currently have from the food and fiber grown on our farms and not be fooled into comparing food with other consumer products.

Delta

Story
From Central Valley Business Times - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Coalition response...Years of study by scientists, biologists, engineers and others have gone into the efforts to establish a reliable water supply and an improved Delta ecosystem. Those efforts have come together under the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Volumes of material is available for review at the BDCP's website - http://baydeltaconservationplan.com/Home.aspx. Various plans to achieve the goals of the BDCP have been submitted and each has been fully vetted. Some elements of these plans have been incorporated into the BDCP current proposal because the researchers have determined that value exists. Other plans have not fared as well.

The current proposal is the closest California has come to safeguarding its water future through a reliable water supply and recognizing the importance of restoring a fragile Delta ecosystem.

WATER SUPPLY

Report
From Aquafornia - Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012

Story
From Porterville Recorder - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Radio news
From Capital Public Radio - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Story
From The Business Journal - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

WATER QUALITY

Story
From ACWA - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

News articles and links from December 18, 2012


WATER SUPPLY

Blog
By Dan Farber
From Legal Planet - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

GROUNDWATER

Story
From SLO Tribune - Monday, Dec. 17, 2012

DELTA

Opinion
From Merced Sun-Star - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012
From Marysville Appeal-Democrat - Monday, Dec. 17, 2012

MEETINGS

Announcement
From Lodi News-Sentinel - Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012

Monday, December 17, 2012

News articles and links from December 17, 2012


Water supply

Letter
From Redding Record Searchlight - Monday, Dec. 17, 2012

Letter
From Redding Record Searchlight - Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012

(The following is in response to the above articles.) 
Coalition response...Governments, including schools, have benefited from Shasta Dam in the form of taxes it has generated to the local economy. Jobs have been created and even the environment has benefited not only at the local level but throughout the State. The study to raise the dam points out that these benefits will continue and even be enhanced.

Rejecting these future benefits is to reject the years of science and research that has gone into developing the proposal. More water in storage means improved conditions for Chinook salmon in dry or critical years as the cold water supply increases. More gravel augmentation for salmon in the upper Sacramento River is also included in the proposal. The survival rate for fish will be increased as a result of water management flexibility.

Column
By Michael Fitzgerald
From Stockton Record - Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012

Coalition response...The author seizes the opportunity of the requirement that all suggestions from the public must be vetted to add some humor to the future of the Colorado River. Absent in his column are the benefits that this water supply provides to millions of people across seven states and the food produced by farmers who use the water for irrigation purposes. Much of the winter vegetables enjoyed by Californians and others come from the Imperial and Coachella valleys. These farmers carefully use the water that comes from the Colorado River to provide a supply of food that is affordable, healthy and reliable.

This food supply contributes to the overall economic benefit of American households. The average U.S. household spends approximately 6.2 percent of their total spending, or $5,945 per year ($2010 dollars), on food and non-alcoholic beverages. The weighted average spending on food and non-alcoholic beverages for other high-income countries around the world is estimated to be approximately 10.2 percent of total spending, or $9,765 annually. Based on these values, the relative difference between food and beverage spending in the U.S. and other high-income countries is $3,820 per household per year (http://www.farmwater.org/foodcoststudy.pdf). On a percentage basis, other high-income countries spend about 64 percent more on food and beverages compared to the U.S.

WATER SUPPLY

Column
By Lois Henry
From Bakersfield Californian - Saturday, Dec. 15, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Saturday, Dec. 15, 2012

Story
From Desert Sun - Saturday, Dec. 15, 2012

Story
From Siskiyou Daily News - Friday, Dec. 14, 2012

Friday, December 14, 2012

News articles and links from December 14, 2012


Water supply

Blog
By Dan Bacher
From Daily Kos - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Coalition response...Rejecting the benefits resulting from the proposed raising of Shasta Dam is to reject the years of science and research that has gone into developing the proposal. More water in storage means enhanced protections for Chinook salmon in dry or critical years as the cold water supply increases. Improved gravel augmentation for salmon in the upper Sacramento River is also included in the proposal. The water management flexibility for water operations in the proposal will result in an increased fish survivability rate.

Some critics of the proposal insist that local projects should replace the raising of Shasta Dam. These local projects usually are coupled with local benefits and would not provide the environmental benefits offered to Chinook salmon.

It is interesting to remember that this discussion would not be taking place today if the original construction plans, which called for a higher dam, were fully undertaken. The plans were adjusted at a time when our nation needed the building supplies for an effort to safeguard our nation during a time of war.

Delta

Viewpoint
By Dan Nottoli and Darrell Fong
From Sacramento Bee - Friday, Dec. 14, 2012

Coalition response...Opposition to planned water system upgrades and ecosystem improvements in the Delta puts the water supply for more than 25 million Californians at risk. It also threatens huge swaths of farmland in the San Joaquin Valley that is the source for much of California's fruit and vegetable crops during certain times of the year.

Years of water uncertainty caused by drought and environmental restrictions, as well as a doubling of California's population from a time when much of our existing water system was built, tells us that the time is right to invest in our future. As President John F. Kennedy said at the groundbreaking for San Luis Reservoir near Los Banos in 1962, "Nothing could be more disastrous for this country than for the citizens of one part of the state to feel that everything they have is theirs and that it should not be shared with the other citizens of the state. That is the way to stand still."  

Water rights for people in the Delta, or anywhere else for that matter, cannot be impacted by new projects. That's the law. Standing in the way of others who want to invest in tomorrow's more efficient water supply system is contrary to what Kennedy told us 50 years ago. And that surely is the way to stand still today.

WATER SUPPLY

Radio news
From Valley Public Radio - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Blog
By Brad Plummer
From Washington Post - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Blog
By Alex Breitler
From esanjoaquin - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

TV news
From KCRA - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Story
From LA Times - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Opinion
By Nancy Isakson and Norm Groot
From Salinas Californian - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

GROUNDWATER

Story
From Modesto Bee - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

DELTA

Story
From Stockton Record - Friday, Dec. 14, 2012

Story
From Contra Costa Times - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Thursday, December 13, 2012

News articles and links from December 13, 2012


Water supply

(This editorial was previously printed in the Redding Record Searchlight.)
Editorial
From Salinas Californian - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Coalition response...Water transfers can provide benefits to both the buyer and the seller including funds for infrastructure improvements and improved water supply reliability as long as the transfers are carefully constructed with protections for both parties. Today's transfer market is much different than it was when Owens Valley water was acquired by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. The Sacramento Valley is rich in agricultural, ecological and water supply resources. Area-of-origin water rights and decision-making led by local officials help protect the region and ensure that today's water transfer agreements more fairly serve all of the parties involved.

WATER SUPPLY

Story
From Western Farm Press - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Story
From San Diego Union-Tribune - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Story
From Fresno Bee - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012
From Merced Sun-Star - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012
From Redding Record Searchlight - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012
From Sacramento Bee - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012
From San Luis Obispo Tribune - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Blog
By Barry Nelson
From NRDC - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Blog
By Jennifer Pitt
From National Geographic - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

Story 
From Los Angeles Times - Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012

Story
From Siskiyou Daily News - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

DELTA

Story
From Woodland Daily Democrat - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012

PEOPLE

Story
From ACWA - Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012