Thursday, September 30, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 30, 2010

Fewer job losses linked to Delta, drought

Story

from Contra Costa Times – Thursday, Sept. 30, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…The current report proves that drought and environmental restrictions in the Delta created negative impacts to those California farmers and farmworkers who rely on water deliveries that flow through the Delta. Water deliveries are projected to be higher this year than in the past two years, which means more planted acres and less farmworkers forced to stand in unemployment lines. A similar report at the end of this year would further demonstrate the dependence by farmers on a reliable water supply. Environmental restrictions and drought have adversely affected that reliability in the past and will continue to do so until California’s water infrastructure is improved.

Delta Watershed Supplies: How Much We All Divert

Blog

from SF Chronicle – Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2010

By Tom Philp

Jerry Brown Supports Construction of Peripheral Canal

Blog

from Indybay – Wednesday, Sept. 29, 2010

By Dan Bacher

MWD sends letter to Reclamation against IID’s proposed water release into Salton Sea

Story

from Imperial Valley Press – Thursday, Sept. 30, 2010

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 29, 2010

Can politicians overcome bias?

Blog

from Blogs by dzetland@gmail.com (David Zetland) – Wednesday, Sept. 29, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…It’s no surprise that the numbers reflecting agricultural employment and harvested acreage show improved conditions for San Joaquin Valley farmers when factoring in 2009 statistics over previous years. Last year’s water conditions improved from earlier years when CVP and SWP water users received increased deliveries through the Delta. These deliveries still failed to reach contract amounts as indicated in the lower harvested acreage totals when comparing 2009 numbers to 2005, the last year of full contract deliveries as stated in the report. More workers returned from unemployment lines in 2009 as farmers increased planted acreage from the previous year. Again, it’s no surprise.

Water district crying wolf

Column

from Stockton Record – Wednesday, Sept. 239, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…People claiming that “extra” water is flowing to Westlands Water District do not understand how farmers use water. This supposed “extra” water was released by federal officials when it was too late to use in the growing season. The water was placed into storage at San Luis Reservoir but federal regulations threatened the availability of that water unless it was removed from the reservoir. Instead of wasting that water, Westlands developed an exchange that allowed the water to be used by urban water users with water returned to Westlands through next year’s urban water supplies.

Stealth State Plan Would End Salmon Fishing in California

Blog

from SF Chronicle – Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2010

By Zeke Grader

Coalition viewpoint…Claims that “secret” talks are ongoing to discuss California’s water future are false. These “secret” talks are open to all signatories to the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Many of the critics of the talks refused to become signatories when the DBCP was first put forward. Yet, these same critics have participated in the public DBCP hearings and will again have that opportunity when the talks conclude and any suggestions are put forward to the DBCP.

Also claiming that farmers use 80% of California’s water supply is false. Farmers are only using 41% and urban families/businesses are using 11%. The remainder goes to the environment. This blogger attempts to discount environmental water in this equation while at the same time seeking more environmental water. How can he want more of something that he claims does not exist?

County supports IID’s Salton Sea mitigation

Story

from Imperial Valley Press – Wednesday, Sept. 29, 2010

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 28, 2010

San Joaquin River restoration getting some thumbs up

Story

from Merced Sun Star – Monday, Sept. 27, 2010

San Joaquin River restoration rolls along

Story

from Fresno Bee – Sunday, Sept. 26, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…Anyone reading this story would get the impression that the San Joaquin River restoration is on track and running smoothly. A closer look at the local impacts or discussing increased river flows with area farmers might change your mind.

Farmers adjacent to the now-flowing San Joaquin River have expressed concern that Bureau of Reclamation project managers have all but ignored concerns over excessive groundwater impacts, a broken levee and requests for assistance to resolve problems associated with river restoration flows. A significant amount of historical groundwater data from monitoring wells has been gathered and the Bureau has declined to use it. Without engaging local interests, the Bureau stands to alienate a lot of people who want to see the project succeed but have legitimate concerns about the ongoing process.

Cardoza-Costa letter to USBR

Blog

Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2010

Sacramento Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Long Overdue

Blog

From Sustainable Delta – Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2010

From the Coalition for a Sustainable Delta: “Anyone living downstream from Sacramento or that relies on water from the Delta must be wondering why they have been forced to deal with the pollution of an outdated sewage plant for the past 30 years. That is how long it has been since the Sacramento Regional County

Coalition viewpoint…This request by the City of Sacramento is unreasonable, especially when considering the millions of dollars that water users have already spent to find solutions to problems besetting the fisheries in the Delta. Other municipalities have stepped forward to rectify their wastewater issues and Sacramento needs to do the same.

CFWC’s response to the Pacific Institute’s 2010 Water Conservation Report

Blog

from farmwaternews – Monday, Sept. 27, 2010

Governor signs Salton Sea Bill

Story

from Desert Sun – Monday, Sept. 27, 2010

Monday, September 27, 2010

CFWC's response to the Pacific Institute's 2010 Water Conservation Report

The Pacific Institute continues to claim simple inexpensive practices can conserve huge quantities of farm water. We disagree with these claims and invite you to learn more by reading the following documents that challenge these assumptions.


California Farm Water Coalition’s letter to the state Legislature

www.farmwater.org/images/stories/pdf/cover%20letter-legislature092710.pdf

NCWA’s letter to Heather Cooley

www.farmwater.org/images/stories/pdf/cooley%20ltr%209%2017%2010.pdf

AWMC and CFWC’s survey findings on Irrigation Practices and Influencers Survey Findings in San Joaquin Valley

www.farmwater.org/images/stories/pdf/awmc%20survey%20report08312010.pdf

News articles and links from Sep. 27, 2010

Secretive meetings on Delta plan defended

Story

from Stockton Record – Saturday, Sept. 25, 2010

SACRAMENTO - Bay-Delta meetings described as secretive and behind closed doors prompted a spirited defense this week from Lester Snow, California's secretary for Natural Resources.

Coalition viewpoint…These meetings have been mis-characterized as secret by those who declined to become signatories to the BDCP proceedings. Those individuals and groups have not been shut out of the BDCP hearings and have participated and submitted comments throughout the process. The current talks include discussions by any BDCP signatories. The results of these talks will be vetted through BDCP hearings that allow anyone to make comments.

San Joaquin River restoration rolls along

Story

from Fresno Bee – Sunday, Sept. 26, 2010

Jerry Brown still refuses to take position on peripheral canal, water bond

Blog

from Indybay newswire

In Defense of Farming

Posted at 12:00 AM on Sunday, Sep. 26, 2010

Text of Obama's remarks to the UN

Text of President Barack Obama's remarks to the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, as provided by the White House:

---

Mr. President, Mr. Secretary-General, my fellow delegates, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honor to address this assembly for the second time, nearly two years after my election as president of the United States.

We've all heard it: The Valley needs to diversify the economy and stop being so dependent on agriculture. We need better-paying jobs, get people out of the fields, and stop the exploitation. The Valley must develop other resources and create another identity; we need to be something more than cows and critters, vines and cheap vino.

I hear the message: We'd be better off without farms and farmers.


I am defensive. We in the Valley already have a powerful economic identity called agriculture. Yet people seem to want to discard it, ignore it, and forget it.


Agriculture in our Valley is a multibillion dollar industry. When compared with the flash of the film industry or the sizzle of high technology, we don't stand a chance. We aren't sexy enough.

Valley agriculture is rarely seen as a dynamic force that combines human capital with the latest technology and cutting edge innovation. We're dull, dumb hayseeds still stuck with old-fashioned traditions.

At best, we squander natural resources like water and pollute the air with our practices. At worst, some will claim the environmental degradation caused by farms can't be off-set -- there is no common ground for compromise.

Clean up the Valley's air by cleaning out farming. End California's water problems by disposing farmers. Stop the oppression of poor, unskilled immigrant and undocumented workers by destroying agriculture.

Many will condemn the practices of big ag operations and trivialize the efforts of small family farms. The public sees images of poverty and we farmers are classified as oppressors of the oppressed, not as employers and employees.

Lost in such a class debate is the ethnic and cultural diversity of our rural communities. Historically, our Valley farms have been the point of entry for immigrants. But no one pays attention to the bottom rung as individuals and groups work their way up to things better.


I take this personally. When younger, I grew confused and even questioned the value of my profession. In the past, I have been shamed into silence. It's been a long time since I've heard outsiders taking public pride in farmers and our agrarian foundations.

Over the past few decades, brutal economic forces have humbled us. Few get filthy rich in farming today, empires are rarely built from working the land. A farmer's wealth is now reduced to the value of his or her water or the potential off-sets of pollution.


Few see food as part of the information and technological revolution. Our biggest fans may be those who play a computer "FarmVille game" and enjoy a virtual connection to caring for neighbors' crops, bringing in harvests and tending the land.


Yet we farmers may be our own worst enemies. Many have felt isolated and hurt. We've been ignored and abused, losing political capital. We begin to distrust our city neighbors, lash out at anything that sounds like it came from San Francisco, and demonize environmentalists. We manifest the same absolute thinking as those who condemn us.

So what is our agricultural identity? Do we sit back and get angry, protest over lack of water, yell louder in order to be heard. Yes. But I also hope we ask: What do we want to be known for?


We now live in a fragmented state: There doesn't seem to be a "one" California but instead many regions, each with their special interests, political leanings and cultural realities. There's an opportunity today for us to be no longer overshadowed by other regions if we define ourselves.


What does that mean for farming in our Valley? Can we construct a new collective identity based on our shared agrarian roots? Instead of trying to be something else, why can't we put agriculture on the top of the list and accept that reality?

Read more: http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/09/24/2091645/in-defense-of-farming.html#ixzz10kJ65668

Friday, September 24, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 24, 2010

Leaders celebrate expanded water plant

Story

from Bakersfield Californian – Friday, Sept. 24, 2010

San Joaquin River Conference is next week; sign up now

Blog

from Fresno Bee – Friday, Sept. 24, 2010

By Mark Grossi

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Special news release for Sep. 23, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT:
September 23, 2010 Jeanne Varga (661) 549-4520

Kern County Water Agency Held Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony and Reception of the Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant


Elected officials and water leaders gathered today for the ribbon-cutting ceremony of the newly expanded Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant. By doubling the capacity of the Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant, as many as 81,000 homes in the metropolitan Bakersfield area can be served. The expansion is the major component of the Kern County Water Agency’s (Agency) Treated Water Capacity Expansion Project (TWCEP), which is part of the largest capital project phase in the Agency’s history.

“The Agency and the Improvement District No. 4 purveyors have worked very hard to develop a long- term plan to improve water quality and supplies for metropolitan Bakersfield,” said Gene Lundquist, Agency Board of Directors President. “This kind of achievement is worth celebrating!”

The upgrades are part of the revised agreement between the Agency and its treated water purveyors that was signed September 21, 2005. The agreement provides for the expansion and upgrade of the Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant. New and enhanced pumping and water treatment and transmission facilities were required to produce and deliver the water contracted by the TWCEP participants (California Water Service Company; the City of Bakersfield; East Niles Community Services District; and North of the River Municipal Water
District, which wholesales to Oildale Mutual Water Company).

“This is a significant milestone for metropolitan Bakersfield by providing an increased treated water supply for the future,” added Lundquist.

The Agency was created in 1961 by a special act of the State Legislature and serves as the local contracting entity for the State Water Project. The Agency participates in a wide scope of management activities, including water quality, flood control and groundwater operations to preserve and enhance Kern County’s water supply— the main ingredient for the well-being of an economy.

###

News articles and links from Sep. 23, 2010

Done in the Dark

Letter

from Contra Costa Times – Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…People become instant critics of processes when they are not invited to participate and will voice outlandish claims in their criticisms. The current talks which non-participants are so upset with may result in progress toward solving water supply reliability and Delta environmental problems. But we won’t know that until the results of the talks are submitted to the public review process. California’s water future deserves this opportunity.

Shine Light on Delta planning

Editorial

from The Reporter – Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…People become instant critics of processes when they are not invited to participate and will voice outlandish claims in their criticisms. The current talks which non-participants are so upset with may result in progress toward solving water supply reliability and Delta environmental problems. But we won’t know that until the results of the talks are submitted to the public review process. California’s water future deserves this opportunity.

Water storage deal will benefit Inland's supply

Story

from Press-Enterprise – Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010

Good water wasted on delta smelt

Letter

from Bakersfield Californian – Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010

Water agencies spar about water release into the Salton Sea

Story

from Desert Sun – Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010

Bill could help preserve water, farmland

Opinion

from Fresno Bee – Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Special news release for Sep. 22, 2010

MEDIA ADVISORY Kern County Water Agency to Hold Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony and Reception of the Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant

WHAT: The Kern County Water Agency (Agency) Board of Directors and staff will hold a Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony and Reception for the newly expanded Henry C. Garnett Water Purification Plant. The Plant’s expansion is part of the largest capital project phase in the Agency’s history. By doubling the capacity of the Plant, as many as 81,000 homes in the metropolitan Bakersfield can be served. A portion of the Plant is powered by the sun through a solar photovoltaic power system that can produce up to 1 megawatt of energy.

WHEN: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. (Tours will be available following the ceremony.) 11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.

WHERE: 811 Nadine Lane Bakersfield, CA 93308

SPEAKERS: Gene A. Lundquist, Agency Board of Directors President Dave Beard, Agency Improvement District No. 4 Manager Martin Varga, Agency Engineering and Groundwater Services Manager

VISUALS: Solar panel array Water traveling through the purification process Poster board pictures and graphics
A half-hour tour will be available following the ceremony.



The Agency was created in 1961 by a special act of the State Legislature and serves as the local contracting entity for the State Water Project. The Agency participates in a wide scope of management activities, including water quality, flood control and groundwater operations to preserve and enhance Kern County’s water supply— the main ingredient for the well-being of an economy.
###

News articles and links from Sep. 22, 2010

Fighting for water

Editorial

from The Record - Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010

Coalition viewpoint...California and the Delta need solutions to water problems confronting everyone. It is undeniable that past efforts, including expensive studies and talks between special interests, have not provided the final answers that everybody needs. While not knowing what might result from the current talks that so many are opposed to simply because they are not involved, it is important that the talks continue. Whatever results from these talks will be plugged into a public review process for further consideration.

Wolf Cries - Howling About Drought - All Wet - No More Doubts Officials Exaggerated Severity of Drought

Blog

from Lloyd G. Carter - Water is scarce, even though 2/3's of the Earth is covered in it! - Tuesday, Sept. 21, 2010

By: Patrick Porgans and Lloyd G. Carter.

Coalition viewpoint...These numbers provide a clear picture of the effect that governmental regulations and the drought, during the past four years, had on water users who rely on deliveries of water through the Delta. As indicated by the bloggers, the water years in the Sacramento Valley from 2006-2009 averaged 16.39 maf, which is a 60% increase, or 6 maf more than during 1989-1992. Despite this increase, water deliveries from the Delta were increased less than 10% during 2006-2009 in comparison to the previous years. Here are the numbers:

Sacramento Valley WY Hydrologic Indices South of Delta Deliveries

1989-1992 10.35 maf 4.33 maf

2006-2009 16.39 maf 4.37 maf

Where did the missing water go? It certainly did not go to San Joaquin Valley farms or 25 million Californians who depend on it for their homes and businesses.

Glimmers of Hope in the Delta

Blog

from NRDC – Tuesday, Sept. 21, 2010

IID to send additional 41,250 acre-feet of water to Salton Sea in 2010

Story

from Imperial Valley Press – Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010

Board of Supervisors consider new water rules for agriculture, growth

Story

from Monterey Herald – Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2010

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Special news release for Sep. 21, 2010

IID to release early mitigation water to the Salton Sea

During a regular meeting of the Imperial Irrigation District Board of Directors, General Manager Brian Brady announced that IID will release 41,250 acre-feet of early mitigation water to the Salton Sea. In total, the district will send 76,250 acre-feet to the sea this year to mitigate impacts through the first six months of 2012 caused by the water transfer agreements authorized by the Quantification Settlement Agreement with the San Diego County Water Authority and the Coachella Valley Water District. This amount, Brady said, includes 35,000 acre-feet of mitigation water to the sea that IID is already obligated to release under terms of the QSA.

Brady told the board that he had advised the Bureau of Reclamation of IID’s intended release of the early mitigation water to the sea in a letter sent yesterday to the bureau’s regional director Lorri Gray-Lee. The district has also submitted a revised annual water order to Reclamation that reflects the change in its consumptive use.

This early release of mitigation water to the Salton Sea consists of 26,400 acre-feet in 2011 and 14,860 acre-feet in 2012, all of which will be delivered this year.

“This is not unused entitlement water,” Brady said. “Rather, it is entitlement water available to IID that we have determined can and should be used in this way as an appropriate and prudent response to uncertainty surrounding the QSA litigation.”

By releasing this mitigation water early, said Brady, the QSA joint powers authority will save an estimated $6.3 million in mitigation reimbursement expenses through the first six months of 2012. It will also reduce the district’s reliance on fallowing to meet its water transfer obligations in the same time period, Brady said, adding that it is consistent with the IID board’s “oft-stated goal of taking on no more financial or environmental risk than the district bargained for when it became a signatory to the nation’s largest agricultural-to-urban water transfer agreement in 2003.”

Click here to view IID General Manager Brian Brady’s prepared remarks from 9-21-2010.

Click here to view Brady's Bureau of Reclamation letter from 9-20-2010.

News articles and links from Sep. 21, 2010

Delta Conservation Plan meeting

Story

from Chico Enterprise Record – Tuesday, Sept. 21, 2010

Monday, September 20, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 20, 2010

Awaiting your reply, Westlands, part II

Blog

from Delta National Park – Friday, Sept. 17, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…The water is being exchanged between Westlands and MWD and represents the flexibility in the water management system. In turn, next year part of MWD’s water allotment will be shifted to Westlands to allow farmers to use it at a time when it is needed on the farms.

Secret meetings over Delta canal enrage lawmakers

Story

from Stockton Record – Monday, Sept. 20, 2010

Coalition viewpoint...Whatever comes out of these talks will immediately move to public discussion within the BDCP process. Critics of the meetings need to ask themselves what has wide-open talks in the past achieved for all of California when it comes to restoring the Delta and establishing a reliable water supply? The result has been mostly more discussion and more money being spent. It is hopeful that what comes out of the talks will avoid delay to further talks that could bring all of California to these two important goals.

Elected Officials Urge Closed-Door Delta Meetings Be Opened to Public

Blog

from Indybay newswire – Thursday, Sept. 16, 2010

by Dan Bacher

Earthquake risk in Delta worse than expected, USGS finds…but, water supply survives

Blog

from California Spigot – Friday, Sept. 17, 2010

Forum explores Delta economy

Story

from Stockton Record – Sunday, Sept. 19, 2010

Thursday, September 16, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 16, 2010

County unable to stop water sales, but vows to be more vocal

Story

from Hanford Sentinel – Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2010

Reclamation Releases Environmental Documents for 2010-11 Water Exchange Among Three Districts

Story

from U.S. Bureau of Reclamation – Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2010

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

News articles and links from Sep.15, 2010

No news yesterday, Sep. 14, 2010.

Today's news:

Closed Door BDCP Meetings Exclude Delta Residents

Blog

from Indybay newswire - Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…Talks are underway that may lead to significant understandings between various groups that might move California closer to a reliable water future and an environmentally restored Delta. The result would be a benefit to all Californians. Yet, those who continue to hold fast to a “me-first” attitude at the expense of others throw temper tantrums because they are not included. It is this type of (re)action that prevents California from moving forward.

Let's do what's right

Letter

from Fresno Bee – Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2010

Monday, September 13, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 13, 2010

Delta: A lake in the making

Story

from Contra Costa Times Sunday, Sept. 12, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…Studies have been conducted and efforts are ongoing to restore the Delta’s environment and establishing reliable water flows that will benefit all Californians. An average of 17% of flows through the Delta are sent to water users south of the region. Millions of acres of farm land and 25 million Californians benefit from the water. It is important to allow efforts such as those underway by the Delta Stewardship Council to continue in finding a reasonable balance between Delta eco restoration and a reliable water supply.

Big money wins again

Letter

from Fresno Bee – Sunday, Sept. 12, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…Individuals making public statements should base those statements on facts, and this letter writer fails that test. Claiming that the State Water Project is a “taxpayer subsidized infrastructure” that farmers take advantage of is far from reality and ignores the fact that water users are paying the full costs of construction, operation and maintenance of the water delivery system. Such false statements do a disservice to the public.

Viewpoints: State water issues won't wait for bond vote

from Sacramento Bee – Sunday, Sept. 12, 2010

Coalition viewpoint…The Pacific Institute attempts to outline a plan that will improve agricultural water use efficiency. We don’t know anyone who doesn’t share that goal. Compared to two previous versions of their report, their water use efficiency targets are finally approaching conservation numbers that agricultural irrigation experts have been estimating – up to about 650,000 acre feet per year.

While their intentions are good, we can’t let a misguided approach to water use efficiency distract policy-makers from the long-term fixes that California’s water supply infrastructure needs. Conservation is important but it can’t do the job by itself.

What about danger to people from Sac’s sewage treatment?

Blog

from Fresno Bee – Monday, Sept. 13, 2010

By Mark Grossi

Build more water storage

Letter

from Fresno Bee – Saturday, Sept. 11, 2010

Family's pear empire in flux

Story

from Sacramento Bee – Sunday, Sept. 12, 2010

Friday, September 10, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 10, 2010

Water Smart: California's water future remains in doubt

TV News

from California TV News – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Water Smart: Water and politics are an ongoing battle

TV News

from California TV News – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Browns Valley ponders selling water to Delta

from Marysville Appeal-Democrat – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Smelt on TV: It must be election season

Blog

from Stockton Record – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

By Alex Breitler

Thursday, September 9, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 9, 2010

Feds seek water deal; west-side farmers balk

Story

from Fresno Bee – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Proposal: Calif. farmers could own water pipes

Story

from Modesto Bee – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Proposal: Calif farmers could own water pipes

from North County Times – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Proposal: Calif. farmers could own water pipes

from San Francisco Chronicle – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Calif. Farmers could get ownership of massive Central Valley water pipes

from LA Times – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Calif. Farmers could own water pipes

from Sacramento Bee – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Water Smart: California farmers disagree on water supplies

TV News

from California TV News – Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

News articles and links from Sep. 8, 2010

California's next one million acre-feet of water

Blog

from Blogs

This is a key time for California water: we are coming off of three years of serious drought and growing political conflict over water allocations. The Legislature passed a comprehensive water bill last November. A major water bond was proposed to fund a wide range of interventions, but has now...

Coalition viewpoint…Individuals in both the agricultural and urban sectors have already achieved increased water use efficiency and are willing to continue their efforts. Farmers have spent millions of dollars to install improved irrigation systems. Homeowners have reduced their water usage and have received increased water bills. Economics play a very pivotal role in determining water conservation practices. In today’s economic climate, calling for new sources of revenue is welcome but a far cry from reality.

Study suggests ways to save lots of water

Story

from Chico Enterprise Record – Wednesday, Sept. 8m 2010

OAKLAND — A report by the Pacific Institute of Oakland lays out water-saving ideas it says could save California a million acre-feet of water a year through whittling water use in homes, business and farming.

Coalition viewpoint…Individuals in both the agricultural and urban sectors have already achieved increased water use efficiency and are willing to continue their efforts. Farmers have spent millions of dollars to install improved irrigation systems. Homeowners have reduced their water usage and have received increased water bills. Economics play a very pivotal role in determining water conservation practices. In today’s economic climate, calling for new sources of revenue is welcome but a far cry from reality. ALSO---Claiming that agriculture uses 80% of the developed water in our state without explaining that more water exists presents an inaccurate picture of California water supplies. Most readers may not realize that California farmers use only 41% of California’s water supply and urban folks account for 11%. The remaining 48% is water dedicated to the environment.

Groups Sue State to Protect the Delta’s Public Trust Resources

Blog

from Indybay – Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2010

By Dan Bacher

The California Water Impact Network (C-WIN), the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) and AquAlliance filed a landmark public trust lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court to protect Delta fisheries and water quality from excessive Delta pumping.

AquAlliance among groups suing state water agencies

Story

from Chico Enterprise Record – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

SACRAMENTO — Three groups, including Chico-based AquAlliance, filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the Department of Water Resources and the California State Water Resources Control Board.

Latest Delta lawsuit could pack a wallop

Story

from Contra Costa Times – Wednesday, Sept 8, 2010

Environmentalists sue state, citing 'public trust' statute

Coalition viewpoint…This lawsuit is part of a coordinated effort to stop needed improvements in the current delivery system that provides water to California families, farmers, businesses and others. The result of this lawsuit could be a catastrophic impact on California’s water supply as we know it. Instead of working cooperatively with other interests to obtain a reliable water future for all, the filers of this lawsuit are hell-bent on achieving their own agenda at the expense of others.

Delta talks going on behind closed doors

from SJ Mercury News – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Delta talks going on in secret

Story

from Contra Costa Times – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

Future of state's water is being discussed in private to help break logjam in committee negotiations

Coalition viewpoint…Any talks that will move California closer to a reliable water future are important and necessary. Those who are not included in the talks become automatic critics and prove why they are not involved. The answer to California’s water problems involves more than providing for just one region of our state. The answer must include a statewide effort that includes protections and reliability for all water users.

Editorial: Can sewage foes fashion a fair Delta cleanup?

from Sacramento Bee – Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010

If you are one of the 1.3 million people served by the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, you might want to prepare for an eventual hike in your monthly sewage treatment bills.

Coalition viewpoint…Here are the FACTS as pointed out by this editorial:

1. The City of Sacramento has for years been dumping its polluted wastewater into the waters that flow through the Delta.

2. The City of Sacramento has opted for dilution rather than undertake a treatment program that many other cities already employ.

3. The City of Sacramento’s sewage discharges have had a negative impact on the Delta ecosystem, robbing fish of needed food supplies.

To infer that Delta water users should pay the future costs of reducing the ammonium discharges into the Delta from the City of Sacramento simply shifts the cleanup cost from the polluters to the people who are suffering from the problem.

Delta residents to get opportunity to review plan for waterway

Story

from Sacramento Bee