BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN
Blog
By Steven Greenhut
From Bloomberg - Sunday, March 31, 2013
Coalition response...The author's alternative proposals, including desalination, recycling
and levee improvements, are already underway in California. Desalination
efforts in Southern California have gone through years of legal challenges and
the permitting process continues. Recycling, as well as conservation, has been
a way of life on California farms and in our cities. California has spent more
than $300 million since 2005 to improve Delta levees and plans to spend more.
The Bay Delta Conservation Plan
(BDCP) does not prohibit the above actions from continuing. The focus of BDCP
is to create a reliable water supply and restore the Delta ecosystem. Seven
years of research by scientists have resulted in the current BDCP proposal,
which is the best opportunity that Californians have in securing their water
future.
Editorial
From Chico Enterprise-Record - Friday, March 29, 2013
Coalition response...Expressing concern about the security of Sacramento Valley water
supplies, as this editorial does, is a reasonable reaction when considering
California's water future. One important factor involving that water future, as
well as past and present water issues, is that the State Water Code issues
assurance to existing water rights; meaning that new water projects cannot negatively
impact current water rights.
Also, the amount of water
transported through the tunnels will be dependent on the available water
supply. If the water supply in the river is low, then the flow through the
tunnel will be less than the 9,000 cubic feet per second. Visit farmwater.org/exportthrottle.pdf to learn more
about the transfer of water through the tunnels.
Lastly, past transfers of water
from willing sellers in the Sacramento Valley to willing buyers south of the
Delta are required to not harm the existing ecosystem, including aquifers. The
Bay Delta Conservation Plan will not alter that requirement.
Press release
From Rep. Garamendi - Thursday, March 28, 2013
Coalition response...Rep. Garamendi's water plan includes water management strategies that
have already been implemented by public water agencies, such as conservation
and recycling. While they can help serve local water users, they're not as
inexpensive as the congressman thinks. His plan lacks the details on how these
achievements should be enhanced in a way that protects local water users from
skyrocketing water bills. New storage systems are ineffective unless we have
the ability to move sufficient water at the right time of the year to meet
local water needs, including water to produce food during the height of the
summer growing season. If Rep. Garamendi is concerned about California's water
delivery system and the environmental challenges the Bay Delta Conservation
Plan is designed to overcome, then he needs to thoroughly read the more than
18,000 pages in the BDCP's environmental documentation, the most comprehensive
review of any project of its kind in the United States.
BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN
Story
From San Diego Union-Tribune - Saturday, March 30,
2013
Story
From Sacramento Bee - Friday, March 29, 2013
Story
From Stockton Record - Friday, March 29, 2013
WATER SUPPLY
Radio news
From KPBS - Monday, April 1, 2013
Story From Contra Costa Times - Friday, March 29, 2013
From San Jose Mercury News - Friday, March 29, 2013
Story
From LA Times - Friday, March 29, 2013
TV news
From KABC 7 - Thursday, March 28, 2013
GROUNDWATER
Radio news
From KQED - Friday, March 29, 2013
TRANSFERS
Story
From Modesto Bee - Monday, April 1, 2013
WEATHER
Story
From Modesto Bee - Monday, April 1, 2013
RIVERS
Story
From LA Times - Friday, March 29, 2013
QUANTIFICATION SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
Story
From Imperial Valley Press - Saturday, March 30, 2013
DAMS
TV news
From KGET 17 - Friday, March 29, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment