Water Use
From: Jay Lund, U.C. Davis
California WaterBlog
There has been considerable
kvetching during this drought about California exporting agricultural products
overseas, with some saying that this implies we are virtually exporting water
that we should be using in California.
Those concerned should take
comfort with California's major imports of virtual water. Much of the food
consumed here comes from other states and countries, and their production, of
course, requires water.
Coalition response... Jay Lund deserves the water industry's "Nobel Prize" for this
concise explanation on the fallacy of exporting water in California farm
products. We live in a global economy. California's place near the top of the
economic heap would not be possible if we tried to produce everything here that
we consume. We have the ability to grow farm products more efficiently and in
quantities greater than anywhere else. That helps keep American food costs the
lowest in the developed world (as a percentage of disposable income) and leaves
money left over for that iPhone.
Fisheries
From: Mike Wade, Modesto Bee
George Skelton's affinity for
salmon is obvious (" It's farmers vs. fishermen," Feb. 23). He
takes great pains to paint a picture that water diversions in the Delta are the
sole cause of the salmon decline, but nothing in life is that simple.
Salmon are impacted by numerous
factors, not the least of which are predatory species such as non-native bass.
Recent studies show that fewer than 10 percent of salmon hatched upstream make
it alive to the sea because they get eaten on their journey through the Delta.
From: David Silva, Modesto Bee
According to " It's farmers vs. fishermen" (Opinions, Feb.
23), the environmentalists want the Delta and salmon fishing to be the same as
it was 200 years ago. They seem to forget that there is now 75 times more
population.
There was a time when most
families had cows, pigs, chickens and vegetable gardens. Now, they depend on
dairies, beef cattle and farmers for their food. It is time for
environmentalists to realize that change is inevitable.
Water Supply
From: Staff, Sacramento Bee
In a concerted effort to aid
California's drought-stricken communities, the Legislature on Thursday sped a
$687 million relief package to Gov. Jerry Brown.
One week after Brown and
legislative leaders unveiled the emergency legislation, both houses of the
Legislature approved the bill with little resistance. The Assembly passed the
bill 65-0, and the Senate sent it to Brown's desk with only three dissenting
votes.
From: Melanie Mason, Los
Angeles Times
A $687.4-million emergency
drought relief package is on its way to Gov. Jerry Brown's desk after easily
clearing the Legislature on Thursday.
Brown and legislative leaders
unveiled the proposal last week to free up the state's water supplies and aid
residents who face hardship due to the drought.
From: Staff, KOVR 13
A $687 million drought relief
plan is heading for the governor's desk, promising plenty of money for public
projects, but leaving farmers feeling left out of the relief.
Farms are getting a good soaking
with this latest storm, but the threat of the drought still lingers.
Danny Merkley with the California
Farm Bureau says this drought bill may save cities' water, but farmers still
come up on the short end, because of how the drought relief is allocated.
From: Jim Johnson, Monterey
Herald
With a crucial deadline months
away, two influential farm industry groups are concerned about Monterey
County's ability to retain a prized Salinas River water-diversion permit.
In letters to county Water
Resources Agency directors, the Monterey County Farm Bureau and Salinas Valley
Water Coalition criticized county actions with regard to the permit and the
work of a permit advisory committee.
From: Don Curlee, Hanford
Sentinel
If California farmers needed an
"ah-ha moment" to reveal the evils of environmentalism the current
drought has surely provided it.
Years of decisions by politicians
and bureaucrats to send millions of acre feet of water through the Delta and
out to the ocean in a foolish effort to protect worthless fish has wasted water
that could have been stored and later used to ease the disastrous drought.
From: Derek Moore, Santa Rosa
Press-Democrat
Organic dairy farmers greeted
proposed legislation to use treated wastewater for livestock consumption with
skepticism Thursday, saying it risks the health of their animals and could
jeopardize their businesses.
"I'm not going to risk our
animals or our customers to an idea that's not tested," said Albert
Straus, president of Straus Family Creamery in Marshall.
From: P.J. Kershaw, Sacramento
Bee
Re "In record drought, state leaders can't ignore agriculture to
save water" (Editorials, Feb. 21): The editorial board
accurately stated that household use of water is scant compared to farm use of
water.
Despite the fact that only about
4 percent of California's fresh water is consumed by households, and the
remaining 96 percent is consumed by farm and industrial and commercial users,
our government agencies and utilities are pushing for a 20 percent reduction in
household water use and for imposition of penalties for failure to abide.
No comments:
Post a Comment