Obama Administration Release Report Announcing Support for Peripheral Canal
Blog
from Indybay – Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
Coalition viewpoint...The good science this writer and others hold up as the underpinnings of the biological opinions were ordered rewritten by a federal judge who termed it “sloppy science.” These same critics of water delivered to San Joaquin Valley farms and 25 million Californians refuse to accept recent studies that point to other factors such as waste water discharge, non-native species, predators and ocean conditions as causing greater damage than the pumps to fish populations. They ignore the benefits of a proposed tunnel conveyance, designed for greater fish protection and paid for by water users. Their objections only delay and increase costs for a Delta solution that will benefit all of California.
Bay-Delta plan faces stormy seas ahead
Editorial
from Sacramento Bee – Friday, Dec. 17, 2010
Smelt, Storms, Surfing and Science
Blog
from SF Chronicle – Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
Valley farmer pays to fix seepage, wants fed to help
Story
from Fresno Bee – Friday, Dec. 17, 2010
Why some of us didn’t cover the tunnels announcement
Blog
from Fresno Bee – Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
Denham: ‘Water will be primary focus’
Story
from Merced Sun Star – Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment